Widescreen

I mean, come on Apple. If you’re going to sell it as a good device for watching movies, you really needed to give it a wide screen. There’s not really any excuse for 4:3 these days

Transreflective screen

Similarly, if you’re going to pitch a device as an e-book reader, then straight backlit LCD isn’t a good solution. I agree that e-ink isn’t a solution for something which needs to be a multimedia platform, but trying to read at night on this is just going to keep me awake

iPhone Connectivity

Having the iTunes store on the device is a great idea, but if you can’t plug in your iPhone (no USB ports) to get the choons, it’s pretty crippled. Even better, let people sync wirelessly! Everyone hates dongles!

Multitasking

OK, it’s an easy dig, but this really is something people want and need. Think of a tablet with hot corners that activate Exposé-style blowouts? Sexy.

Stylus Input & Handwriting Recognition

Maybe this is a bit of a stretch, but for me a prime use case for a tablet is as a quick note-taking device. With a capacitive stylus and a quick notes app, this could have been a great bit of additional functionality.

Hardware Extras

Camera, front-facing camera, proper GPS, USB ports (as above), HDMI output . . . I assume these were all left out to keep the costs down, but not having them limits the potential of the device – particularly the camera and the GPS, surely this should have more functionality than the iPhone?

Doubtless in a year’s time you’ll all point to this post as an example of “No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.“ but this is just how I see it right now. I don’t doubt it’s fantastic to use for what it is; I just think that it’s missing too much stuff to be truly great.

Edit: put much more succinctly by Bad Horsey on B3ta

• The plugins are working really well for me
  • Chromed Bird (the Twitter client) updated soon after I switched, adding tabs for @replies and DMs, which made me a lot happier. There’s a couple of little odditie (clicking “compose tweet” doesn’t shift focus into the text box, for example) but overall I’m very happy.
  • The Gmail Checker also recently updated, giving a really nice preview with delete / archive / mark read buttons right in the plugin. I actually prefer this to FireFox’s Gmail Manager now.
  • Adblock is a bit flakey, but it’s doing a good enough job that I’m not driven totally up the wall.
  • Flashblock is, as always, ace.

One of the only other things that was annoying me for browsing at work was being able to set proxy settings. Chrome generally picks up the IE settings, but I have a couple of exclusions which I’d customised in FireFox but can’t in IE as we’re locked out of the settings. Thankfully, Chrome supports a command line parameter, –proxy-pac-url, which you can point to a Proxy Auto Config file. This allowed me to grab the corporate PAC file, make a few changes, save it to my local disk, and point Chrome at it. Happy days! Clicking on links to my internal Butty Run server no longer results in annoyance

At home, I’m using it on Linux, and the experience is largely the same apart from the click-in-url-bar issue. If you’re not familiar with this, then essentially on Windows the default is that clicking in the address bar selects the whole URL, where on Linux it’s not. I understand the arguments from both sides; I’d even agree that on Linux the default is correct; however as someone who switches between both environments, the change is quite jarring. I wish there was a preference to switch this around, but AFAICT there isn’t.

This brings me to the thing I miss most about FireFox. Overall, I’m very impressed with Chrome. It’s much, much, much snappier than Firefox; the startup time in particular is ludicrously fast. The downside is that I feel a little more locked down, a little less able to customise. On FireFox’s about:config page you can change pretty much anything about the way the browser works under-the-hood, but Chrome doesn’t seem to have an equivalent.  As someone who enjoys tinkering, this grates a little. I’m going to stick with Chrome because day-to-day I do find it more usable, but I’ll continue to miss the little bit of extra freedom that FireFox gave me.

I’ve always said that the one thing holding me back from switching from FireFox to Google Chrome was the lack of extensions. I rely on GMail Manager, EchoFon (formerly TwitterFox) and the Google Reader Notifier to be my eyes and ears during my browsing sessions, and I feel lost if I don’t have a browser that supports them. Today, I came across a blog post on OMG! UBUNTU! which describes 5 new Chrome plugins . . . including ones which replace all of the ones above. So I’m trying it.

One week on Chrome, at home and at work, and I should know pretty quickly whether I can stick with it or not. There will be other extensions I’ll miss, doubtless (AdBlock Plus, FlashBlock I’m looking at you), but I’m hoping the increased snappiness of Chrome will make up for them. Besides, I’ve been meaning for ages to set up my personal web proxy to strip out ads there . . .

I’ve had serious Wave envy since the first people started getting their invites, along with most other heavily-online people. It was the same with GMail as well – I swear that if Google announced GWetPaintWatch then people would be clamouring for invites to it. It’s odd that even when the feedback has been largely “meh” people still want to see what they feel they’ve been missing out on. I think it’s a more ephemeral version of standard geek gadget lust – whatever is the latest and greatest, we want to be part of it, even when it’s not something we can physically hold.

First thoughts? It’s technically impressive, but it’s got the classic problem of most communication mediums – until most people you know are using it, it’s largely useless. Jury’s out until next year or so then.

That being said, I do have some spare invites if anyone else wants to get amongst